|
|
For many years, my lab has been actively
involved in developing and applying ideal observer theory in the study of
perceptual systems. Ideal observer theory uses the concepts of Bayesian
statistical decision theory to determine optimal performance in a task, given
the physical properties of the stimuli and some biological constraints.
Organisms generally do not perform optimally in any given task, and thus the
aim of ideal observer theory is often not to model the performance of the
organism per se, but instead to provide a precise measure of the
stimulus information available to perform the task, to provide a computational
theory of how to perform the task, and to serve as an appropriate benchmark
against which to evaluate the performance of the organism. Bayesian ideal
observer theory is a very powerful tool and provides the theoretical foundation
for much of the work in my lab.
Our early work introduced the concept of
sequential ideal observers and applied them in the domain of pattern detection
and discrimination (Geisler, 1984; Geisler & Davila, 1985; Banks, Geisler
& Bennett, 1987; Geisler, 1989). The central idea of sequential ideal
observers is to allow inclusion of known anatomical and physiological constraints
into the ideal observer analysis. Comparing optimal performance with and
without the constraints provides a precise measure (and understanding) of the
information processing limitations imposed by those constraints. Our early
ideal observer work also uncovered some interesting physical laws; for example,
the physical limit for spatially resolving two features decreases with the
fourth root of stimulus intensity, and the physical limit for detecting changes
in the relative location of two spatially separated features decreases with the
square root of intensity. These laws go some way toward explaining, for
example, “hyperacuity”—the ability to discriminate changes in spatial
configuration that are far smaller than the spacing between receptors. More
recent work has applied Bayesian ideal observer theory in analyzing neural
processing in the retina (Arnow & Geisler, 1996) and in the primary visual
cortex (Geisler, et al., 1991; Geisler & Albrecht, 1995; 1997; 2000). Most
recently, we have been applying ideal observer theory in the study of
perceptual tasks that involve complex natural stimuli (Klarquist, et al., 1994;
Geisler et al., 2001) and in the study of the evolution of perceptual systems
(Geisler & Diehl, 2003).
|
|